I am anxious as I heard that usually the editor just needs 1 week to decide if a paper deservesto be sent for peer review or not. Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. We would recommend waiting for about a week or two. RRIDs are provided by the Resource Identification Portal. Journal reference: 1. Answered by Shalender Singh and JavaScript. Your cover letter must include a valid institutional email address for each author. Or did the editor make his/her final decision but simply was too lazy to write a reply? The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Available from: www.cancer.org. Combination artwork should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi. [CDATA[> All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete. For small-sized journals, the figures should be 119 mm wide and not higher than 195 mm. Science Journals: Editorial Policies | Science | AAAS A month sounds optimistic to me :-) [deleted] 4 yr. ago. Statements should include, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person. This service is available to authors at the time of decision or at a later time. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Sustainability submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. Accessed December 31, 2006. http://www.springernature.com/gp/group/data-policy/faq. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c.. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. To add lettering, it is best to use Helvetica or Arial (sans serif fonts). You should hear back within a week or two. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. They should consider if the authors have complied with the journals policy on the availability of research data, and whether reasonable effort has been made to make the data that support the findings of the study available for replication or reuse by other researchers. In addition to the above, manuscripts that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals should include the following declarations: Authors of research involving human or animal subjects should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee and reference number, if available). The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.. Chapter in book: 2. Changes of authorship by adding or deleting authors, and/or changes in Corresponding Author, and/or changes in the sequence of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Authors will be asked to resolve the dispute themselves. The published work will directly reflect the quality of the artwork provided. The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of a clinical trial is "any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes". Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in If the manuscript is transferred, the original reviewer reports and identities will be shared with the receiving journal (with the exception of transfers to the npj Series and Scientific Reports). Nature paper - Manuscript timeline : r/labrats - Reddit sciencenature - Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs. Authors are recommended to adhere to the minimum reporting guidelines hosted by the EQUATOR Network when preparing their manuscript. Specifically this graph shows that the ratio of peer-reviewed vs. submitted manuscripts is floating around 13%. This journal encourages authors to adopt RRIDs when reporting key biological resources (antibodies, cell lines, model organisms and tools) in their manuscripts. manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________. For clinical trials that have not been registered prospectively, authors are encouraged to register retrospectively to ensure the complete publication of all results. What does the status under consideration mean? Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. has received research support from Company A., The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.. In such cases, material from other sources should be used. Biotechnology Letters | Submission guidelines - Springer Individuals may consent to participate in a study, but object to having their data published in a journal article. When it is not possible to share research data publicly, for instance when individual privacy could be compromised, data availability should still be stated in the manuscript along with any conditions for access. If human cells are used, authors must declare in the manuscript: what cell lines were used by describing the source of the cell line, including when and from where it was obtained, whether the cell line has recently been authenticated and by what method. Name your figure files with "Fig" and the figure number, e.g., Fig1.eps. Springer Nature. Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. on 14 Jun, 2022. 2. To find out more about publishing your work Open Access in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, including information on fees, funding and licenses, visit our Type manuscript in English, double-spaced on numbered pages with 1- to 1.5-inch margins. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision. We strongly recommend that you suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions - recommending reviewers only from your home country or your own institution is likely to result in your paper being rejected. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*: Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. These submissions are subject to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. The author(s) is/are requested to contact the journal and explain in what sense the error is impacting the article. sciencenature - Biotechnol. Under certain circumstances consent is not required as long as information is anonymized and the submission does not include images that may identify the person. Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between "Editorial 1 Answer to this question Answer: The status "Under Editorial Consideration" for this journal is equivalent to the status "Manuscript submitted successfully" which shows up for most journals once the submission is complete. //-->Submission Guidelines | Nature Biotechnology Nature Communications Primary research articles require a disclosure statement. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . Interests that should be considered and disclosed but are not limited to the following: Funding: Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number) and/or research support (including salaries, equipment, supplies, reimbursement for attending symposia, and other expenses) by organizations that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript. The Journal and Publisher assume all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. Decoding decisions | Nature Chemical Biology No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (plagiarism). The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Consent to participate and/or Consent to publish. Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. ISSN 1087-0156 (print), Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID). Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. Once you have completed this, your article will be processed and you will receive the proofs. Interests within the last 3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing the work for submission) should be reported. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. . Most institutions will have specific policies on this subject. Exceptions where it is not necessary to obtain consent: Images such as x rays, laparoscopic images, ultrasound images, brain scans, pathology slides unless there is a concern about identifying information in which case, authors should ensure that consent is obtained.