Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. However, theres much room for improvement in the household cleaner, deodorant, fem hygiene, and thousands of pharmaceutical products. Animal testing has been in practice under different names - from sacrifices to witchcraft to science - from at least 500BC. Heres what you need to know to stop the abuse and end animal experiments. Weird Animals Discover the Unusual and Rare Animals That Will Leave You in Awe! In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. Arguments against animal testing. The Debate on Animal Not to mention it is unnecessary and there are many newly developed options that avoid animal cruelty. Here are the top five reasons why it needs to stop: 1. HIV, schizophrenia, Parkinsons disease, heart disease, and certain types of cancer are human diseases. By supporting our work to end testing and experiments on animals, you will help countless rabbits, mice and other animals languishing in laboratories. A decades worth of wins against cosmetics animal testing, Out of the cage, into the future: Exploring the newest technology in animal-testing alternatives, test shampoo, mascara and other cosmetics. She also excels at dog-speak and cat-talk and is working on mastering fish lingo. Humans use many tests to check the reliability and safety of products such as medications and cosmetics, and specific types of testing use inhumane methods to produce results. As White Coat Waste Project has documented, in some of the standard tests the FDA compels companies to conduct, puppies as young as 1 week old are forced to ingest massive doses of experimental drugs, often resulting in convulsion and death. This page was last edited on Wednesday, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:16 UTC. PDF Unnecessary Animal Research Is Unethical and Scientifically - tesd.net Some tests include killing pregnant animals and doing testing on their fetuses. 1. Why Is Animal Testing Unnecessary - 1448 Words | Studymode This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). When they have to endure scientific and medical experiments, its incomprehensible. Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is unnecessary. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinsons disease or schizophrenia. It is not a very sufficient way of study because the results are often not accurate and at least 16 million dollars is spent each year. One of the main problems with animal testing are the methods that are used. Period. There are billions of great people in this world. In the United States of America, 16 billion dollars had been used on animal experimentation- 1.9 million dollars are used on the experimenting on heart diseases on dogs conducted by Ohio State University, 5 million dollars were used on obesity experiments conducted by Oregon National Primate Research Centre, while 16 million dollars were used by Harvard University to fund 1200 individual experiments on drug addiction by using monkeys as test subjects. Furthermore, there are more efficient and moral technological advancements that allow products to be tested without the endangering of animals. Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on animals. This test measuring toxicity often leads to blindness, scarring, death, and insurmountable pain. People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. Shes experienced living abroad and believes that together people can evoke change for the better. Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. Why Animal Testing Is Necessary and How to Reduce It - Biobide Technology has exploded in the last few decades. "Is Your Experiment Really Necessary?" in Orlans 26). Havefull or partial bans on cosmetics animal testing, including all European Union countries, Australia, India, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway and South Korea. 1258 Words6 Pages. Substances that cause cancer in people affect animals differently, and only one-third cause cancer in animals. Additionally, some medicines that may work for us are dangerous for animals. Theres no doubt that animal testing is to the apparent benefit of people. The Body Shop, 1993. The findings of animal studies are unreliable. By providing your mobile number, you agree to receive autodialed, recurring text messages from the HSUS with updates and ways you can help animals. 26 Sept. Similarly, heart and kidney transplant techniques, plus vital anti-rejection medication, were developed using animals. Animal testing should not be part of a university lab experiment paid for by the tax-payer who is against animal torture in the first place. Other experimental methods can be used to produce more reliable results without causing harm to any species. Testing on monkeys at 500 times the dose given to the volunteers totally failed to predict the dangerous side effects. Sadly, nobody reported how those animal subjects felt after having the medication forced on them. But the FDA forces drugmakers to do it AARF Act would allow use of alternative testing methods for agency approval of drugs A yellow Lab puppy. Silcock, Sheila. In the United States alone, an estimate of 100 million animals are used for testing and in European countries over 12 million animals are sacrificed each year for testing. Animals are still sufferingand dyingto test shampoo, mascara and other cosmetics. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didnt work in human beings. The other is if they share that much genetic material with us, does it make sense to harm them? The Draize test has been criticized for being unreliable and a needless waste of animal life. The findings of animal experimentation are not reliable and conclusive. Animal testing is a practice of brutality that is forced upon millions of animals worldwide. The animals die agonizingly, suffering internal bleeding, diarrhea, vomiting, paralysis, convulsions, and horrendous pain. The reason why animals testing is so important for scientist and ultimately human race is because, animals testing allow the progress of life saving treatment for humans and animals. Animal Rights. Theyre also cost-effective and dont subject animals to cruel and unnecessary animal tests. Most of the animal testings fail and this shows there is no need for it. The history of cancer research has been the history of curing cancer in the mouse. It's bad science. Learning Outcome Present perspectives on an ethical issue of Many animals, especially the higher mammalian species, possess internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs. This experimental drug passed muster on mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys. Can Biologists Describe New Species Without Killing Them? In another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done inside a test tube. Animal subjects dont suffer from the same illnesses as humans. Times, and technologies, are changing. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there. This is because it violates animals' rights, causes pain, suffering, and death. While it has contributed significantly to the advancement of medicine and other fields, there are several arguments against animal testing that have led to the ethical debate surrounding this practice. Unfortunately, animal experiments only make the grade about half the time. Animal research facilities should promote the health of animals, not human health. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of humans waiting for effective cures because the results mislead experimenters and squander precious money, time, and other resources that could be spent on human-relevant research. Also, now there are other available methods to test product toxicity. One of her proudest accomplishments is typing while petting a fur baby on her lap. Educators that insist on using animal specimens rather than non-animal alternatives as teaching tools miss a valuable opportunity to teach their students about humane education and are not implementing the 3Rs principlereduction, refinement, and replacementregarding the use of animals (Dissection in the. Since death is the required endpoint, dying animals are not put out of their misery by euthanasia" (154). Orlans, F. Barbara. Human beings often volunteer for human trials to help find cures for human diseases. Some industries, like cosmetic companies, are making strides and not testing on animals. Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and elsewhere have shown that these 21st-century methods are more accurate at predicting how drugs will behave in humans than animal tests. The sad part is that research using lab animals takes enormous resources and squanders money, time, human intelligence, and creativity. Animals do not get many of the diseases we do, such as Parkinsons disease, major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimers disease, HIV or schizophrenia. Many opponents of animal testing argue that there are alternative methods of testing that are just as effective and more humane. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Web. Animal testing is unreliable and unnecessary - Parlia Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is unnecessary. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. For the benefit of human patients and lab animals, companies should be allowed to innovate and use the most cutting-edge drug development tools instead of being compelled by the government to abuse animals in painful, outdated and inefficient experiments. Its time for the U.S. to catch up with the E.U. Animal experimentation is wrong and cruel and there are many reasons why it is not necessary today. This test is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. New Scientist 134 (1992):31-33. Why Is Animal Testing Unnecessary - 936 Words - Internet Public Library Others argue that scientific progress has helped save millions of human lives. CQ Roll Call is a part of FiscalNote, the leading technology innovator at the intersection of global business and government. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. Yet, the Food and Drug Administration requires it for certain approvals. In a new monoclonal antibody treatment tested on monkeys at 500 times the recommended human dose, human volunteers suffered near-fatal allergic reactions.